SUMMARY Retained swab or instrument is rare but potentially lethal. High risk situations have been identified. Both incorrect counts and omitted counts are responsible.
Retention of a swab (sponge) or surgical instrument is an indefensible negligent error that occurs in 1 out of 1000-1500 abdominal operations1. This corresponds to more than 1500 annual incidents in the U.S.2, about 170 in Canada.
Although such retention may go undetected for years3 or cause only nuisance symptoms, it can result in fistula 3, perforation or obstruction4 of the bowel, sepsis and death1,5.
For abdominal and pelvic surgery, the Association of Operating Room Nurses (AORN) recommends6 four swab and instrument counts:
| PRACTICE
POINT
Swab and instrument counts recommended by AORN:
|
However, local hospital Procedures may vary such recommendations.
High risk situations have been identified.
Some of the risk factors for retained swabs and surgical instruments have been identified2:
| PRACTICE
POINT
Risk factors for retained swabs or surgical instruments:
|
Both incorrect counts and omitted counts are responsible.
Failure to document counts occurs in only a minority of malpractice cases arising out retained swabs or instruments following abdominal and pelvic operations.
By contrast, failure to count or document counting is the norm in repair of episiotomy and vaginal tear after childbirth, and such cases account for 10% of claims7. Arguably, such Community Standard is unacceptable and indefensible.
Even when counts are correct, and especially when they are not, there is arguably an onus on the surgeon to undertake a routine exploration of the operative field before closing.
Following abdominal and pelvic surgery, hospitals vary in their Policies on the use of immediately postoperative radiography for detection of swabs and instruments6,8.
| PRACTICE
POINT Variants in hospital Policy criteria for the use of post-operative radiography after abdominal or pelvic surgery:
|
However, radiographs may fail to detect swabs up to 10% of the time7, despite their routinely containing radio-opaque markers. On occasion, interpretation of the radiographs is erroneous.
PRACTICE POINT Potential Causes of nursing/medical malpractice Action: 1. swab or instrument count
2. surgeon failed to check operative field 3. check radiographs
|
Copyright © 2009 Electronic Handbook of Legal Medicine